<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; conservation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aconservationtrust.org/tag/conservation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aconservationtrust.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:45:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Proposed Lyman Town Forest</title>
		<link>http://www.aconservationtrust.org/2010/02/04/active-projects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aconservationtrust.org/2010/02/04/active-projects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lyman Town Forest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gardner Mountain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lyman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[town forest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nhact.wordpress.com/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

UPDATE: The bond lost at town meeting (see below for project story). A record number of people came out to vote. We knew it would be a difficult hurdle to win the 2/3 majority necessary to pass the bond, which would have put the final large piece of funding in place to purchase the property [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>UPDATE</strong></span>: The bond lost at town meeting (<em><strong>see below for project story</strong></em>). A record number of people came out to vote. We knew it would be a difficult hurdle to win the 2/3 majority necessary to pass the bond, which would have put the final large piece of funding in place to purchase the property (the Open Space Institute had given its support just days before town meeting).</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">One of  the  biggest obstacles we faced is that it is simply a very challenging and uncertain time for many. People continue to look for ways to reduce their spending &#8211; understandably. The other big obstacle was timing. Experience around the state pretty consistently shows that successful land conservation bond votes typically take a good year of organizing and communication before earning town meeting approval. In this case we had about three short months, including the holiday season, but that&#8217;s the way the deal came down.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">At the town meeting, there were many people who were listening to the details about the town forest proposal for the first time. Many of them voted against it. I was very pleased to learn, however, that several residents who had come to all of the informational sessions and asked many tough questions, ended up supporting the bond. We appreciate the landowning family&#8217;s willingness to work with us, and are grateful to the residents of Lyman for carefully considering this opportunity.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">There may be other ways to conserve this great land &#8211; we&#8217;ve got our thinking caps on and will let you know&#8230;if anyone out there is interested in a prime conservation buying opportunity, be in touch!</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 20px; color: #339966; font-weight: 800;">The Town Forest Opportunity</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The residents of Lyman, N.H. (pop. 547) have the opportunity to purchase a major part of what gives their town its character. The Gardner Mountain range is the backdrop of town when looking to the west. It is land that generations of residents have enjoyed for hiking, hunting, snowmobiling, and exploring. The 1,100-acre property on the Gardner Range ridgeline is 99% forested and has an extensive woods road system as a result of being managed as commercial timberland. The property includes critical wildlife habitat identified by the N.H. Fish and Game Department.  The parcel was proposed for a wind energy development in 2004, which the town rejected. In the Lyman Master Plan, residents named Gardner Mountain as one of the key places in town to conserve.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The family of the late landowner wants to sell the property, and following his wishes, has offered it first to the town. The landowner had started a quiet conversation back in 2006 about potential town ownership. ACT was first contacted at that time about devising a way to take advantage of this opportunity. But the landowner died unexpectedly, and it took until last year to settle his estate. His family approached the town again, and the Board of Selectmen asked several citizens to assemble more information about the opportunity.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<div id="attachment_336" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 280px"><a href="http://www.aconservationtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/dsc_0047.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-336  " title="Lyman mine 1" src="http://www.aconservationtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/dsc_0047-300x199.jpg" alt="" width="270" height="179" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Evidence of Gardner Mountain&#39;s mining past.</p></div>
<p>Working with the citizen volunteers,  ACT enlisted the Trust for Public Land (TPL), a national organization that specializes in assembling financing for large conservation projects. The property was analyzed for wildlife, water quality, recreational, timber, and other conservation attributes, and an appraisal was made.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">With this information in hand, the select board endorsed the project and gave TPL the go-ahead to enter into a purchase and sales agreement, contingent on the funds being raised from a variety of sources. The property would be set up as a town forest with a conservation easement held by ACT to forever protect its natural values and guarantee public access.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Lyman voters will be asked to support the  acquisition by approving a $346,000 bond  at March town meeting. The purchase price is $865,000, based on the appraisal. From outside funding sources, over half of this amount has already been raised. The project has won major grants from New Hampshire&#8217;s Land and Community Heritage Investment Program and the Fifteen Mile Falls Mitigation and Enhancement Fund.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">In the 19th century Gardner Mountain was alive with the sounds of mining. Lyman is in the heart of what was once called the Ammonoosuc Gold District. Today the big find in the mines are bats. The Paddock Mine on Gardner Mountain is home to the second largest population of bats in New Hampshire. Bats are under a huge amount of stress right now because of habitat loss and more severely, a disease called white-nose syndrome. They are most susceptible in their hibernation places, where they need their rest. Please do not enter or disturb the mines! But you can take a virtual tour, through photos taken last summer, by following the link below&#8230;.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">You can <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/actnh/sets/72157623352281618/" target="_blank">see more photos of the mines here.</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.aconservationtrust.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aconservationtrust.org/2010/02/04/active-projects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A River Runs It! Get With The Flow</title>
		<link>http://www.aconservationtrust.org/2009/11/12/a-river-runs-it-get-with-the-flow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.aconservationtrust.org/2009/11/12/a-river-runs-it-get-with-the-flow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Latulip</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Travel & Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut River Joint Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fluvial Geomorphology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nhact.wordpress.com/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For many years I have been actively working with the Ammonoosuc Conservation Trust to select and preserve significant properties with conservation easements. There are many challenges to good conservation work, not the lest of which is finding the resources to fund the transaction cost to protect the land.

Last evening I attended a session sponsored by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For many years I have been actively working with the Ammonoosuc Conservation Trust to select and preserve significant properties with conservation easements. There are many challenges to good conservation work, not the lest of which is finding the resources to fund the transaction cost to protect the land.</p>
<p><img class="size-full wp-image-37 alignleft" title="Ammonoosuc River" src="http://www.aconservationtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/ammonoosuc-river.jpg" alt="Ammonoosuc River" width="360" height="220" /></p>
<p>Last evening I attended a session sponsored by the Connecticut River Joint Commission, whose job it is to study the Connecticut River, to hear the science behind river protection. The study of rivers is called Fluvial Geomorphology and by the end of the evening I  had a new appreciation for the scientists that spend their lives studying the rivers. The fundamentals of river behavior and the general principles of fluvial geomorphology are sedimentation, hydraulics, restoration, fish habitat improvement, riparian grazing management, and streambank erosion. Problem solving techniques for watershed management, riparian assessment, fish habitat structure evaluation, stream restoration, non-point source pollution and the integration of ecosystem concepts into watershed management are the outcomes of this kind of serious study.</p>
<p>As you can well imagine, it turns out that water will make its own path regardless of how man has tried to train  or confine it to new barriers. The ripple effect of changing the flow of water at one point works its way back to the point of original tampering. It has been estimated that over one third of the Connecticut River’s 85 mile stretch from Pittsburg, NH to Dalton, NH has been manipulated by man. In the 1800’s, when logging was the primary industry, the river was straightened to prevent log jams. Water powered mills popped up to take advantage of no cost power. The railroads also played a part in moving the water’s course to reduce the cost of building bridges over meandering streams.</p>
<p>Slowly, over time, the river has worked to regain control over its original path. Seems we could all take a lesson from the fluvial geomorphologists. Let’s get with the flow and stop operating our lives from a place of fear, shake it up, let’s have some fun!</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.aconservationtrust.org/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_120_16.png" width="120" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.aconservationtrust.org/2009/11/12/a-river-runs-it-get-with-the-flow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
